Comparison
Netaj vs Mouseflow
An honest head-to-head — what each platform does well, where they overlap, and where they don't.
Netaj gives you Mouseflow's behavior analytics plus a real visual A/B testing editor in one platform — and unlike Mouseflow, it's built natively for Arabic, RTL, and Salla stores.
Feature-by-feature comparison
| Netaj | Mouseflow | |
|---|---|---|
| A/B Testing | Built-in visual editor, server-side allocation, no flicker | Not included — requires a separate tool (VWO, Optimizely, etc.) |
| Heatmaps | Click, scroll, attention, and movement heatmaps with RTL support | Click, movement, scroll, attention, and geo heatmaps |
| Session Recordings | Full rrweb-based replays with frustration scoring built in | Full session replays with friction events |
| Form Analytics | Field-level drop-off and time-to-complete in the recordings view | Dedicated, mature form analytics module |
| Friction / Frustration Scoring | Frustration score per recording: rage clicks, dead clicks, JS errors | Friction score across sessions and pages |
| Surveys | On-site surveys and NPS, fully bilingual EN/AR | Feedback campaigns and surveys |
| Native Arabic / RTL | Dashboard, editor, and widgets all RTL-first | English-only UI, no RTL-aware editor |
| Salla Integration | Native Salla app, installed in one click from the Salla App Store | Generic JS snippet only — no Salla app |
| Pricing | Starter 99 SAR / Pro 349 SAR / Enterprise 999 SAR per month via Salla — A/B testing included on every plan | From €31/mo for 5,000 sessions, no A/B testing included |
Why teams switch from Mouseflow
- Stop paying twice — Netaj replaces Mouseflow plus a separate A/B testing tool with one bill starting at 99 SAR/mo on your Salla subscription.
- Run experiments directly on the sessions and heatmaps you just analyzed, without piping data between platforms.
- Get a dashboard, visual editor, and survey widget that actually work in Arabic and RTL — Mouseflow has neither.
- Install from the Salla App Store in one click — Salla injects the tracker for you, so there's no generic snippet to paste and no theme update to break it.
Where Mouseflow still wins
- Mouseflow's form analytics module is more mature, with deeper field-level reporting than Netaj's in-recording view.
- They have been in the session replay space since 2009, so their replay player and filtering UI feel very polished.
- Their friction scoring works across aggregate sessions and pages, while Netaj's frustration score is per-recording today.
Pricing at a glance
Netaj
Netaj: 99 / 349 / 999 SAR per month, billed through your Salla subscription.
Mouseflow
From €31/mo for 5,000 sessions, no A/B testing included
Frequently asked questions
Is Netaj a true alternative to Mouseflow?+
Yes. Netaj covers the same core: session recordings, heatmaps, funnels, surveys, and frustration scoring. On top of that you get a real visual A/B testing editor, which Mouseflow doesn't offer.
Does Mouseflow support Arabic and RTL stores?+
Mouseflow can record an Arabic page like any other, but its dashboard, editor, and survey widgets are English-only and not RTL-aware. Netaj is built RTL-first end to end.
Does Mouseflow integrate with Salla?+
No, there's no official Salla app. You have to install their generic tracking snippet manually. Netaj is a native Salla app: install it from the Salla App Store and Salla injects the tracker automatically.
Can I run A/B tests with Mouseflow?+
Not natively. You'll need a separate tool like VWO, Optimizely, or Convert and stitch the data together. Netaj includes A/B testing on every plan, starting at 99 SAR/mo.
How do friction scoring and frustration scoring compare?+
Both flag rage clicks, dead clicks, errors, and U-turns. Mouseflow aggregates the score across sessions and pages; Netaj scores each recording (rage clicks ×4, error clicks ×4, JS errors ×5, dead clicks ×2) so you can sort recordings by pain.
Ready to see what you're missing?
One click from the Salla App Store. Cancel any time from your Salla dashboard.
Install Netaj from the Salla App Store